LC vs SBLC: 10 Key Differences to Optimize Your Trade Finance Strategy
- Valentina Todorova
- Jul 24, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Authored by Valentina Todorova, Credit Glorious
Navigating the complexities of international trade requires a clear understanding of financial instruments designed to mitigate risks and ensure smooth transactions. Among these tools, Letters of Credit (LC) and Standby Letters of Credit (SBLC) are pivotal for global trade. While both serve as guarantees, their applications and structures differ significantly. Understanding these differences can empower businesses to select the right solution for their needs.
Below, we explore the ten most critical distinctions between LC and SBLC, with practical examples to illustrate their ideal use.
What Is a Letter of Credit (LC)?
A Letter of Credit is a financial instrument issued by a bank to guarantee payment to a seller, provided specific terms and conditions are met. This document ensures that the seller receives payment as long as they provide the required documentation.
Uses: Primarily utilized in international trade to facilitate payment between buyers and sellers.
Key Benefit: Reduces payment risks for sellers by guaranteeing funds upon meeting conditions.
What Is a Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC)?
An SBLC serves as a secondary payment method, activated only if the primary payment agreement fails. It’s more of a safety net than a direct payment mechanism.
Uses: Commonly used as a performance guarantee or backup payment assurance across various contracts.
Key Benefit: Protects beneficiaries against non-performance or non-payment by the counterparty.
10 Key Differences Between LC and SBLCÂ Â
1. Primary Purpose Â
LCÂ ensures payment for a specific transaction is completed.
SBLCÂ acts as a fallback guarantee, triggered only upon default of the primary obligation.
Example:
LC: A German machinery exporter ensures payment from an Indian buyer when shipping equipment.
SBLC: A contractor uses an SBLC to guarantee performance under a construction agreement.
2. Usage Frequency Â
LCÂ is actively used for routine trade transactions.
SBLCÂ is reserved for contingency scenarios, backing obligations like leases or project deadlines.
Example:
LCÂ might be used repeatedly for monthly raw material imports.
SBLCÂ secures a lease agreement, ensuring rent payments if the tenant defaults.
3. Trigger for Payment Â
LCÂ requires document submission confirming compliance with specified terms.
SBLCÂ is invoked only when the applicant defaults on their primary obligation.
Example:
LC: Payment is made after presenting a bill of lading.
SBLC: Payment is processed only if a borrower fails to meet loan obligations.
4. Risk Exposure Â
LCÂ minimizes seller risk by guaranteeing timely payment.
SBLCÂ reduces risk for beneficiaries as a form of insurance against defaults.
Example:
A steel producer receiving payments from unreliable clients benefits from using LCs.
A property owner provides an SBLC to ensure long-term tenant performance.
5. Documentary Requirements Â
LCÂ demands detailed documentation specific to the trade deal (e.g., shipping documents).
SBLCÂ typically requires simpler default-related documentation.
Example:
LCÂ needs packing lists, invoices, and customs clearance proof.
SBLCÂ may only demand proof of non-payment or non-performance.
6. Application Scope Â
LCÂ focuses on goods or service trade payments.
SBLCÂ covers broader obligations, such as rental agreements or loan guarantees.
Example:
LCÂ is ideal for international commodity trading.
SBLCÂ can secure a government project bid.
7. Cost Structure Â
LCÂ incurs processing fees proportional to transaction size, making them costlier.
SBLC has moderate fees since they’re not as frequently drawn upon.
Example:
Frequent exporters might see higher costs using LCs monthly.
SBLCs, issued for a one-time construction project, are relatively budget-friendly.
8. Nature of Assurance Â
LCÂ provides primary assurance for fulfilling payment obligations.
SBLCÂ acts as a secondary safety mechanism.
Example:
Sellers prefer LCs for guaranteed payment on delivery.
Suppliers ask for SBLCs when extending credit to reduce default risks.
9. Beneficiary Advantages Â
LCÂ ensures immediate payment security.
SBLCÂ secures indirect financial guarantees in broader contexts.
Example:
A Portuguese textile exporter receives quicker payment via LC.
An SBLC ensures builders meet progress milestones for funding.
10. Global Adoption Trends Â
LCÂ dominates high-volume trade finance globally.
SBLCÂ sees higher application in industries requiring performance guarantees or long-term commitments.
Example:
Asian manufacturers rely heavily on LCs for cash-flow stability.
European firms use SBLCs for real estate or infrastructure investments.
When to Use LC vs SBLCÂ Â
Use Cases for LCÂ Â
High-value or high-risk transactions requiring upfront payment guarantees.
Ongoing supply chain needs, ensuring uninterrupted operations.
Any transaction requiring strict adherence to shipping or delivery schedules.
Practical Example Â
A French wine exporter uses an LC for payments from a North American distributor to secure funds on shipment arrival.
Use Cases for SBLCÂ Â
Agreements needing assurance in case of defaults (e.g., leasing, construction, investments).
Cross-border trade where the primary party’s reputation or financial health may be uncertain.
Acts of non-performance compensation in service or project-based contracts.
Practical Example Â
A Paris-based tech startup rents office space in Berlin, backed by an SBLC in case of payment defaults.
How to Choose the Right Instrument for Your Business Â
Selecting between an LC and an SBLC depends on your business needs and the nature of the transaction.
Evaluate Transaction Risk: Does the deal require immediate assurance (choose LC) or contingency coverage (choose SBLC)?
Consider Cost Implications: Choose an instrument aligned with your financial strategy.
Understand the Scope: Define whether the deal involves goods/services (LC) or performance obligations (SBLC).
Leverage Expert Guidance: Consult financial advisors to ensure compliance and optimal decision-making.
At Credit Glorious, we specialize in providing tailored financial solutions for SMEs and international businesses. Whether you’re importing goods or securing a long-term lease, our team ensures that you access the right tools to thrive in global markets.
By understanding these critical differences, businesses can confidently manage risks and leverage financial instruments like LC and SBLC to expand operations globally. Trust Credit Glorious to guide you through choosing enhanced trade finance solutions. For smarter, secure transactions, let us empower your growth today.
.png)